I'm of two minds about the Church of Jesus Christ of the Latter-Day Saints, otherwise known as Mormonism, which is the religion of Mitt Romney.
On the one hand, I genially dismiss all religious dogmas which take the form of truth claims. Despite the manful efforts of gifted theologians and apologists throughout the centuries, faith (at least the portion represented by falsifiable statements about alleged real-world events) and reason continue to be mutually exclusive. I don't think any intelligent person genuinely believes in transubstantiation, for instance. In fact, I don't even think any intelligent person could even conceive of what it would be like to believe in transubstantiation.
The same goes for the various virgin births and miracles and the truth claims contained in the Jataka tales, Muhammed's night journey, Methuselah's age, etc. The more intelligent sort of religious person quietly acknowledges that these fables usefully inspire the simple-minded, but regards them as slightly embarrassing. They are like the 'miraculous' madonna figures in various cathedrals which are draped with lovingly hand-sewn (often kitschy) robes and jewelry. We discreetly walk past these, even though they are surrounded by throngs of believers, to admire some elegantly carved Gothic altar.
This is all by way of saying that I'm not singling Mormonism out. But boy howdy, Mormonism is strange. In America, it's considered poor form to mock someone's religious beliefs, no matter how odd they are. But the rules are different in Europe, so here goes. Mormonism's very origins are entertaining, as Laurie Winer's fine potted history of the religion (and its changing beliefs) shows:
In 1823, [founder of the church Joseph] Smith later reported, he was first visited by the angel Moroni, who revealed to him the existence of ancient golden plates, buried two miles from the Smith home, on which the true story of the gospel was written. Years later Smith, having “purified” himself, took possession of the plates. He kept them covered and advised friends and family that looking at them would mean instant death. Peering into a stovepipe hat and using a seer stone, Smith dictated what would become the Book of Mormon to different scribes. The plates told the story of mankind in a language called “reformed Egyptian.” Among the surprises: in 600 B.C., after being warned by God to flee Jerusalem, a Hebrew prophet named Lehi and his family built a ship and sailed to America.
Take that, Columbus! And here is the conception of the afterlife:
There are three heavens and one hell. The three heavens are ranked from most holy to least by their “degrees of glory." The celestial kingdom is the most desirable, and serves as the destination for all those who accept Jesus, are baptized within the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints (whether before or after death), and remain faithful throughout their lives. People who die before the age of 8, when Mormons are baptized, also go to the celestial kingdom. The next most desirable heaven is called the terrestrial kingdom, which holds all those who don’t fully accept Jesus on Earth, but who are basically good people and accept him after death. The telestial kingdom is for those who never truly accept Jesus, and includes murderers, as well as “liars, and sorcerers, and adulterers, and whoremongers, and whosoever loves and makes a lie.” These unbelievers must first suffer for their sins, but eventually end up in a blissful place “surpassing the great understanding of men.”
Now, this isn't going to be one of those ZOMG-this-crazy-religion-makes-Romney-dangerous posts. Like most Americans, Mitt Romney is expert at keeping his religious beliefs and his wordly interests separate when they conflict. Romney's behavior shows a mixture of cunning greed (as his world-class tax fiddling shows), religious charity, and political prudence and moderation. He's already told us he won't let his religion influence his Presidential policies, and I believe him.
But really, the more you read about Mormonism, the more delightfully kooky it becomes. And the special bonus is that the world -- definitely including Europe -- is crawling with well-groomed young men who want induct you into their preposterous religion! Mitt Romney spent a couple years in France doing just that, surely to the bemusement of the French. They're easily recognizable by their white shirts, name tags, dark pants, and backpacks:
I see them at least once a week in Düsseldorf -- often the same guys. Now next time you meet one, you can ask them what that stovepipe hat was for...
In the end people believe what they want to believe, not what is believable.
Eben.
Posted by: Marcellina | September 08, 2012 at 08:53 PM
@Marcellina: But shouldn't you take into account the acceleration of everything? Aren't 1000 years from a long time ago just about the same as 100 years now?
100 years ago Germany was still ruled by a caste of riding "warriors" who presented themselves with bushy helmets and sparkling swords. The next 50 years brought more change than the 1000 years before. Remembering the last Emperor of Germany is like remembering the middle ages.
And maybe that's the reason why people find stories of a garden eden in Missouri and a angel Moroni appealing. It's a world without change, completely out of time. In a world which is changing faster and faster that's something outstanding. In the end people believe what they want to believe, not what is believable.
Posted by: noribori | September 04, 2012 at 07:54 PM
Mormonism = "Christian fan fiction"
Source: http://ca.reddit.com/r/AskReddit/comments/yzoqx/i_just_heard_my_dad_call_mormonism_christian_fan/
Posted by: la23ng | September 04, 2012 at 04:04 PM
@Noribori, I was giving them the 2-thousand-year advantage we have on them with the Jesus story. Can't really say what will be believed by then, but things that are said to have happened back in the dreamy distant past tend to be more believable to humans than if they happened two hundred years ago. Angel appears to Mary = sure. Angel appears to Joseph Smith = no way. My point is that the first is no more believable and yet our culture has more of a problem with the second.
We saw "The Book Of Mormon" in New York last month, and it was awesome. And covered just these points in a vague way — that religion is stories invented to make people feel better about their existence, and therefor has a place in human history.
Posted by: Marcellina | September 04, 2012 at 09:22 AM
Mormons have had their hands on the levers of power before without buggering the polity with joe smiths lunatic theology; take Marriner Eccles, appointed chief of the federal reserve by FDR, who anticipated Keynes, as in this resonant analysis. (See Wikipedia, which gives the source.).
" As mass production has to be accompanied by mass consumption, mass consumption, in turn, implies a distribution of wealth ... to provide men with buying power. ... Instead of achieving that kind of distribution, a giant suction pump had by 1929-30 drawn into a few hands an increasing portion of currently produced wealth. ... The other fellows could stay in the game only by borrowing. When their credit ran out, the game stopped."
Like Obama, Romney will wear the mask, and for the most part act accordingly, no matter what one hopes or fears is underneath.
Posted by: James rytting | September 04, 2012 at 08:18 AM
You mean, if only I had more of a penchant for wearing black trousers with a white shirt and tie and had avoided being such a whoremonger the celestial kingdom would be mine?!! Alas!
Posted by: John Carter Wood | September 03, 2012 at 09:09 PM
@Marcellina: A couple thousand years? That's optimistic. I'm afraid it could be only a matter of a few decades.
Posted by: noribori | September 03, 2012 at 03:25 PM
I look at it this way: it might seem ridiculous to us to believe that the Garden of Eden was in Missouri, but it is any more believable to put it somewhere between the Tigris and the Euphrates, as "serious religious scholars" do? Or Noah's Ark at the top of Mount Ararat? It's all pretty much the same, only the Mormons' stories seem more silly to us because they are so new. Give them a couple thousand years and it'll be totally mainstream.
By that time, the Garden of Eden will be "known" to have been in Missouri, and no one will be so dumb as to believe that men once walked on the Moon.
Posted by: Marcellina | September 03, 2012 at 01:57 PM