« Saturday Music Blogging: Erykah Badu 'Window Seat' | Main | A Lesson in Anglo-Saxon Irony »

TrackBack

TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516a2569e2013485a249f2970c

Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Heil Hahnemann: Globuli in the Third Reich:

Comments

Cleo Pascal

That's what I've been pointing out to my friends. If that natural health therapy doesn't really work, then why has it lasted this long? Homeopathy is a culture in its own right because it has been passed on from generation to generation. Anyway, I think homeopathy was popular among the Germans at that time because of the war. The turmoil caused so much anxiety among the people that they developed all sorts of illnesses that had to be cured right away. Good thing homeopathy was available then.

Best Colon Cleanse Product

all i have amounting to say is wow. it worked for me. maybe the kindred shaken (up) with this product didn't unquestionably use it aptly. it is possible that they skipped absent of a midget bit suggestive of exercise. it worked for me and that's all i have amounting to say within (easy) reach it. now im booming virtually the same as get my ACUs modish a lesser bulk as they seem a particle awkward for me with it.thanks for your product

swish

I enjoyed your article. Thank you for sharing your thoughts.

Swish

Tioma

They take it because it works. Welcome to the new age. Modern conventional medicine benefits from placebo effects and its crass slash and burn techniques are largely outdated. Watch 'What the Bleep Do We Know'; we are energetic beings.

Brian Foley

"... (interestingly, it's most popular, in Europe, among female college graduates) ..." Why does this surprise you? I was an ex-pat living in Germany for almost the entire eighties and nineties, and unless something has drastically changed, that demographic is the most gullible and inclined to believe anything alternativ that I've ever met.

One of the perks of being back home is that the women don't know everything better than I do.

They're just smarter than I am.

B

noribori

Let’s just say: homeopathic treatment isn’t exactly what the Nazis became famous for.


...predictably, showed that homeopathic remedies had no effect on illnesses except a placebo effect. Basically prayer in pill form.

Comparing placebos with prayer, you must either have a high opinion of prayers or a very low opinion of the placebo effect.

Two quotes from the English Wikipedia entry about placebo:


• Those with Alzheimer’s disease lose the capacity to be influenced by placebos, and this is attributed to the loss of their prefrontal cortex dependent capacity to have expectations.

• Motivation may link to the meaning through which people experience illness and treatment. Such meaning is derived from the culture in which they live and which informs them about the nature of illness and how it responds to treatment. Research upon the placebo treatment of gastric and duodenal ulcers shows that this varies widely with society: those in Germany having a high rate placebo effect while those in Brazil a low one. Placebo effects in treating gastric ulcers is low in Brazil, higher in northern Europe (Denmark, Netherlands) and extremely high in Germany. But the placebo effect for hyper.tension is lower in Germany than elsewhere.


Many people have heard of homeopathy, they have some expectations. The expectations alone can be reason enough why it might work.

A better, more convincing concept than homeopathy to benefit from the placebo effect is certainly possible. I’m sure you could easily come up with a convincing concept. But do people really care about the concept of homeopathy? Do they even know it? If they know it than they will also know that the concept is 200 years old. No wonder the explanations are strange. And it comes as no surprise that scientists don’t like such stuff.
So homeopathy is pretty immune against rational criticism. Would your own concept of a placebo treatment be similar immune against rational thinking? Or would you even try to argue as rationally as possible? But the more rationally you argue, the more will people try to understand it and argue against it. They will do some researches and soon find there is no rational basis for your rational arguing.
Irrational stuff seems to be a better basis to exclude or overcome doubts. Either you trust it, or not.

I met people eating little pills with substances collected by native people in the Himalaya region. I met people who told me strange stories about alkaline nutrition. I met people who believed in dangerous charlatans, like this one.
“57 percent of Germans have taken homeopathic remedies at some time or other”, says the SPIEGEL cover story. An unbelievable high number. None of my friends has taken globuli, AFAIK, and I didn’t, and I don’t intend to. But if one of my friends told me he might try it, would I burst into tears, would I laugh or call him an idiot? Certainly not. It seems pretty harmless (57%!), and, you never know.


Ceterum censeo: it’s Nuremberg, not Nuremburg. Please.

The comments to this entry are closed.

Flickr Photostream

My Photo

Search German Joys

  • Google

    andrewhammel.typepad.com