...they're watching an ad that'll leave one heck of a wound track in your political consciousness:
Fans of comparative politics might be interested by the fact that Gorman never even mentions her party affiliation.« Give Referees iPhones II | Main | Octopusses (Octopi?)... »
TrackBack URL for this entry:
http://www.typepad.com/services/trackback/6a00d834516a2569e201348515d544970c
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Meanwhile, Back at the Ranch...:
The comments to this entry are closed.
> Wow. She really seems to be a charming person. Ugh
A racist swine. The, um, natives had better ideas on the issue, and they are more charming, too. Let's give them a handout, money is all they
wantneed.Posted by: M. Möhling | July 08, 2010 at 06:51 PM
"The provision was intended to force political candidates running any campaign for office in the United States to associate themselves to their television and radio advertising, thereby discouraging them from making controversial claims or attack ads."
It isn't hard to come up with circumstances under which a candidate would be unwilling to support a message on his behalf, though. Think the Log Cabin Republicans publicly endorsing McCain, or the International League of Communist Abortionists airing an Obama commercial...
Posted by: cohu | June 29, 2010 at 07:18 PM
BTW: Is there some legal requirement for any political ad to have the candidate say that "I'm Johnny Dipshit and I support this message." thing? It would seem highly improbable that a candidate would not support a message on his or her behalf.
Posted by: Junger Gott | June 29, 2010 at 06:49 PM
Wow. She really seems to be a charming person. Ugh.
Posted by: cohu | June 29, 2010 at 06:22 PM